Welfare spending by governments, non-government community services organisations and households was nearly $80 billion in 2003-04 according to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare's latest expenditure report, Welfare Expenditure Australia 2003-04.
Mr John Goss of the Institute's Expenditure and Economics Unit said this is an increase of 15%, or more than $10 billion since 2002-03.
Welfare expenditure on older people accounted for the largest share of the $80 billion total ($28 billion) followed by families and children ($27 billion) and people with disabilities ($14 billion). The remaining $11 billion was spent on a range of other groups.
Of the $80 billion welfare expenditure, $20 billion was spent on welfare services - an increase of $2.4 billion, and an 8.3% increase over the previous year.
'This was higher than the growth in any year in the last five years, and was mostly due to a 38% increase in funding from non-government community services organisations,' Mr Goss said.
Welfare services for older people was the area of most rapid growth in funding by the Australian Government, averaging 11% per year from 1998-99 to 2003-04.
On a per person basis, expenditure on welfare services (in current price terms) in 200304 was $1,006, up from $655 in 1998-99.
Almost half of the expenditure incurred by non-government community services organisations was funded by governments with a further 25% funded by clients' fees for services, and 26% from the non-government community services organisations own funding sources.
The greatest percentage of household contributions (83%) was in the form of client fees for services provided by non-government community service organisations. An additional 10% was spent on services provided by governments, and the remaining 7% for informal child care.
In 2003-04, total welfare concessions to households (including Australian Government tax expenditures) were estimated at $22.2 billion. Most of this (92.8%) was in the form of Australian Government social tax expenditures or tax exemptions for individuals. About three-quarters of this amount went to older people with the remainder going to families and others, such as low income earners.
We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.