Comparing health and welfare data between countries helps policy planning and decision making.
Researchers, policymakers and the general public are often interested to see how Australian experiences compare on an international scale.
Many countries face similar health and welfare challenges and have similar goals. International comparisons provide a global view and allow lessons to be shared across countries.
The results provided here show how Australia compares with member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Most OECD members are high-income economies and are regarded as developed countries. Due to these similarities, OECD countries provide a useful basis for comparisons with Australia.
There is a lot of good news on the health front in Australia—we have one of the highest life expectancies in the developed world, and our overall burden of diseases has fallen. The vast majority of us rate our health as ‘good’ or better—internationally we are one of the leading countries on this measure.
However, it is important to note that, given their complexities, there is no single indicator or measure that can adequately summarise the health or welfare of a person or population. While it is useful to compare health and welfare on an international scale, comparisons of this nature are complex due to the diverse nature of the sectors, the data sources and definitions across countries.
The AIHW maintains the Australian section of OECD Health Data, which is the most comprehensive source of comparable statistics on health and health systems across industrialised countries. The database contains information on health status, health care services and health care spending for member countries.
Information from OECD Health Data facilitates international comparative reporting, supports policy planning and decision making, and enables health-related research and analysis.
Most Australian data supplied for inclusion in OECD Health Data come from databases maintained by the AIHW, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the Department of Health and the Department of Human Services.
For further information, see the OECD Health Statistics online database.
Australia and Korea had the highest 5-year net survival rates for rectal cancer (71%)
Australia had the highest rate of retained foreign object after surgery (7.5 per 100,000 hospital discharges)
Australia had the highest rate of PE after hip and knee replacement discharges (523 per 100,000 hospital discharges)
Australia had the third lowest AMI in-hospital mortality rate (3.2 per 100 separations)
Australia had the second highest sepsis rate after abdominal discharges (3996 per 100,000 hospital discharges)
Australia had the highest rate of DVT after hip and knee replacement discharges (809 per 100,000 hospital discharges)