Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2022) Australia's children, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 10 August 2022.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Australia's children. Retrieved from https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australia's children. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 25 February 2022, https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's children [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2022 [cited 2022 Aug. 10]. Available from: https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2022, Australia's children, viewed 10 August 2022, https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/children-youth/australias-children
Get citations as an Endnote file:
PDF | 17.6Mb
25/02/22 – In the Data section, updated data related to social networks are presented in Data tables: Australia’s children 2022 – Social support. The web report text was last updated in December 2019.
Social networks provide people with a sense of connection and can be a source of support both generally and in times of need. They consist of relationships and contacts developed through social interactions and can be developed face-to-face or through another medium such as the telephone or the Internet. For most children, their family forms the foundation of their social network, but friends and teachers play a progressively important role as children get older (Korkiamaki & Ellonen 2008). Increasingly, children are using social media and other digital technologies to facilitate the development of their social networks (Allen et al. 2014; Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2018)
The quality of a child’s social network can impact their health, development and overall wellbeing (Klocke & Stadtmüller 2019). For children, the benefits of social networks include:
For children, it is not just their personal social networks that can impact their wellbeing, but also those of their family. Families with strong social networks have been found to have increased access to information, material resources, and friends and neighbours to assist them in managing their daily lives and problems (Marshall et al. 2001; Armstrong et al. 2005; Heaney & Israel 2008). Having someone to rely on in an emergency is an important safety net, especially for families with children.
For school-aged children, the school environment plays a key role in the quality of social networks (Korkiamaki & Ellonen 2008). Children who have more friends are more likely to be self-confident, have good social and emotional skills and are more likely to perform better at school (DSS 2015). A strong social network at school is likely to lead to a sense of belonging which has been associated with higher reading achievement (see Education).
National representative data on children’s perspectives of their social networks is limited with 1 self-reported measure of social support included in this section. This section predominately focuses on the self-reported perceptions of the type of social networks available from the perspective of respondents aged 15 and over who live in households with children aged 0–14 (Box 1).
The ABS GSS measures social networks in terms of social contact and support in times of crisis. Results for respondents (aged 15 and over) living in households with at least 1 child aged 0–14 are reported here.
The LSAC measures social networks in terms of support available to both the child and their primary parent (the parent who knows the child best). Children are asked directly who they would talk to if they had a problem and were able to select multiple responses.
The primary parent was asked a series of questions to form a social support scale to measure how often different types of support are available to parents. The social support scale is the average of 15 questions designed to measure the availability of:
Social isolation and loneliness can be harmful to mental and physical health. Having regular contact with (or connecting to) people, especially with family and friends, is an important component of having a strong or positive social network. Living in isolation, especially from extended family networks and support services, has been associated with less effective parenting behaviours and practices and poorer parental mental health, which are, in turn, associated with poorer health, development and wellbeing outcomes for children (Wise 2003; Zubrick et al. 2008).
According to the ABS 2014 GSS, 77% of respondents (aged 15 and over) living in households with at least 1 child aged 0–14 had face-to-face contact with family or friends living outside their household at least once a week. This increased to 94% for non-face-to-face contact, such as phone or video calls, emails, or text messages at least once a week. This is in line with research that suggests more and more people are turning to non-traditional forms of social connection as a way of expanding or better maintaining their social networks (Collin et al. 2011; Office of the esafety Commissioner 2018).
Being able to get support or help when needed is a good indicator of the quality of the strength of social networks (AIHW 2010, 2012).
For children, social support is often measured by whether they felt they had someone they could talk to about their problems (AIHW 2012).
For adults, social support is often broader, including more tangible support such as financial or physical assistance. Having access to a broad range of social supports can support better parenting and result in improved outcomes for children, including:
97% of children had someone to talk to if they have a problem
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that most children (97% or around 223,000) aged 12–13 had a least 1 person they could talk to if they had a problem. Around 88% (or 202, 000) would talk to their mum and/or dad, with more likely to talk to their mum than their dad (86% compared with 64%). Children were also likely to talk to a friend (68%) if they had a problem (Figure 1).
Note: Children may choose to speak to more than 1 person so totals do not add to 100%.
Chart: AIHW. Source: AIHW analysis of the LSAC.
It is estimated using data from LSAC in 2016 that 62% of (or 142, 000) primary parents said they have social support most or all the time. Just over 2% said they had no social support.
Primary parents of children who need or use more medical care, mental health or educational services than is usual for most children of the same age were less likely to have support available most or all of the time compared with other primary parents (54% compared with 63%) (Figure 2).
According to the 2014 GSS, most (96%) respondents aged 15 and over living in households with children aged 0–14 felt they were able to get support in times of crisis. Fewer (87%) somewhat agreed or strongly agreed that they could find someone to help when needed (not necessarily a crisis).
There was very little difference in availability of support in times of crisis between population groups.
4 in 5 respondents aged 15 and over living with a child aged 0-14 get support from a family member in times of crisis
The 2014 GSS found that respondents living in households with children aged 0–14 had sources for support, including:
Family members and friends were the most commonly reported source of support (82% and 71%, respectively). Very few (4%) reported they had no source of support (consistent with the percentage of people who indicated they were able to get support in times of crisis).
Children are increasingly using digital technology to form social networks (Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2018; O’Keeffe & Clarke-Pearson 2011; Wilson 2016). This is supported by the 2016 Digital Participation survey which found that more than one-third (34%) of participants aged 8–13 used social media (Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2016). More detailed analysis of children’s engagement in digital social networks, including the quality of these networks and/or if they impact social networks formed in more traditional ways, would be informative.
For more information on:
AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) 2010. Australia’s health 2010. Australia’s health series no. 12. Cat. no. AUS 122. Canberra: AIHW.
AIHW 2012. Social and emotional wellbeing: development of a Children’s Headline Indicator. Cat. no. PHE 158. Canberra: AIHW.
Allen KA, Ryan T, Gray D, McInerney DM & Water L 2014. Social media use and social connectedness in adolescents: the positives and the potential pitfalls. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist 31:18–31.
Armstrong MI, Birnie-Lefcovitch S & Ungar MT 2005. Journal of Child Family Studies. 14:269.
Collin P, Rahilly K, Richardson I & Third A 2011. The benefits of social networking services: a literature review. Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing. Melbourne.
Croninger R & Lee V 2001. Social capital and dropping out of high school: benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record—TEACH COLL REC 103:548–581.
DSS (Department of Social Services) 2015. Footprints in Time: The Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children—Report from Wave 5. ISBN: 978-1-925007-73-2. Canberra: AIHW.
Ferguson KM 2006. Social capital and children’s wellbeing: a critical synthesis of the international social capital literature. International Journal of Social Welfare 15(1):2–18.
Heaney CA & Israel BA 2008. Social network and social support in Glanz K, Rimer B K Viswanath K(eds) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice—4th edn. San Francisco, United States of America.
Klocke A & Stadtmüller S 2019. Social capital in the health development of children. Child Indicators Research 12:1167.
Korkiamaki R & Ellonen N 2008. Social capital, social work and young lives. Nordic Journal of Social Work 28:82–99.
Marshall NL, Noonan AE, McCartney K, Marx F & Keefe N 2001. It takes an urban village: parenting networks of urban families. Journal of Family Issues 22(2):163–182.
Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2016. Young and social online. Viewed 28 August 2019,
Office of the eSafety Commissioner 2018. State of play—youth, kids and digital dangers. Australian Government.
O’Keeffe G & Clarke-Pearson K 2011. Clinical report—the impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. American Academy of Pediatrics 127:800–804.
Wilson S 2016 Digital technologies, children and young people's relationships and self-care, Children’s Geographies 14:(3)282–294.
Wise S 2003. Family structure, child outcome and environmental mediators: an overview of the Development in Diverse Families Study. Research paper no. 30. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Zubrick S, Smith GJ, Nicholson J, Sanson A & Jackiewicz T 2008. Parenting and families in Australia. Social policy research paper 34. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
For more information, see Methods.
We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.
The browser you are using to browse this website is outdated and some features may not display properly or be accessible to you. Please use a more recent browser for the best user experience.