Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2018) Hospital Performance: Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals from 2012–13 to 2014–15, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 06 July 2022.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Hospital Performance: Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals from 2012–13 to 2014–15. Retrieved from https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospital-performance-costs-acute-patients-2014-15
Hospital Performance: Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals from 2012–13 to 2014–15. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 15 November 2018, https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospital-performance-costs-acute-patients-2014-15
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Hospital Performance: Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals from 2012–13 to 2014–15 [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018 [cited 2022 Jul. 6]. Available from: https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospital-performance-costs-acute-patients-2014-15
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) 2018, Hospital Performance: Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals from 2012–13 to 2014–15, viewed 6 July 2022, https://pp.aihw.gov.au/reports/hospitals/hospital-performance-costs-acute-patients-2014-15
Get citations as an Endnote file:
PDF | 347Kb
This measure compares the costs of acute admitted patients against a common unit of activity, termed the National Weighted Activity Unit (NWAU).
Cost per NWAU is a measure of the cost of an ‘average’ acute admitted public hospital service and an indicator of hospital efficiency.
This measure compares the operational costs, of services provided to acute admitted patients at similar hospitals, adjusted for different types of patients served by different facilities. The analysis period is from 2012–13 to 2014–15.
The indicator is reported by:
The data used to calculate cost per NWAU is sourced from three different collections:
Hospital and patient level data were provided by the IHPA to the AIHW on 26 September 2017 (excluding patient level data for NSW).
Hospital costs data are sourced from the NHCDC held by the IHPA. The NHCDC collects data for activity based funding purposes and records the vast majority of health system costs at a patient or ‘product’ level, according to the AHPCS. The NHCDC includes the allocation of indirect costs from the general ledger. To ensure that the quality of NHCDC data is robust and fit-for-purpose, the IHPA commissions an independent financial review to assess whether all participating hospitals have included appropriate costs and patient activity.
Hospital activity data on the number of acute care separations are sourced from the IHPA’s Activity Based Funding Admitted Patient Care data collection (ABF APC data collection). The scope of the ABF APC data collection is episodes of care for admitted patients in all public and private acute and psychiatric hospitals, free standing day hospital facilities and alcohol and drug treatment centres in Australia.
As the costs of private patients not publicly funded are not fully recorded by the NHCDC in some jurisdictions the IHPA sources extra data from the HCP data set to better estimate the complete costs of private patients. This adjustment is undertaken by the IHPA for the NEP Determination. The HCP data set, managed by the Department of Health, collects data directly from all private health insurance providers and covers all privately insured admitted patients.
The numerator is in-scope acute admitted operational costs for a hospital.
In-scope costs are included on the basis of nationally comparability, including: allied health, imaging, pharmacy, pathology, critical care, hotel goods and services, non-clinical and on-costs, operating room, prosthesis, specialised procedure suites, ward medical, ward nursing and supplies.
Nationally comparable costs exclude blood costs, teaching, training and research (where TTR is costed separately), depreciation, payroll tax, medications subsidised by Commonwealth programs (e.g. the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) and property, plant and equipment.
The denominator is in-scope acute admitted NWAUs (NEP 2017–18, AR–DRG v8.0) for a hospital.
An NWAU is a measure of health service activity expressed as a common unit, against which the NEP is paid. It provides the basis for understanding the activity undertaken at a hospital during the financial year (number of admissions), adjusted for the relative complexity of patients admitted to the hospital. The NWAU has many adjustments relating to patient characteristics beyond the AR–DRG classification, including Indigenous status, remoteness, patient age, length of stay, ICU hours and leave days. The average hospital service is worth 1 NWAU, the most intensive and expensive activities are worth multiple NWAUs, and the simplest and least expensive are worth fractions of an NWAU.
(Numerator ÷ denominator), indexed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Government final consumption expenditure (GFCE) hospital and nursing home deflator to 2014–15 prices (adjusted for inflation), rounded to the nearest $100.
Growth rates for the GFCE hospital and nursing home deflator are:
The reported activity is consistent with the IHPA’s National Efficient Pricing Model, and only includes patients who were both admitted and separated within the reported financial year.
The following patient types are included in the cost per NWAU analysis: public patients, private patients (insured), contracted care patients and self-funded patients.
Patients whose services are not eligible for Commonwealth funding under activity based funding are excluded from the cost per NWAU calculation. This includes: Department of Veterans’ Affairs patients, Department of Defence patients, compensable patients and motor vehicle third party personal claim patients.
The following care types are excluded: other sub-acute, non-acute and non-admitted emergency department care.
The reporting of selected hospitals is suppressed to ensure robust comparable results and protect the privacy of patients.
Hospitals were reported if they met the following criteria:
We'd love to know any feedback that you have about the AIHW website, its contents or reports.
The browser you are using to browse this website is outdated and some features may not display properly or be accessible to you. Please use a more recent browser for the best user experience.