The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper
Citation
AIHW
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2015) The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper, AIHW, Australian Government, accessed 04 December 2023.
APA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2015). The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper. Canberra: AIHW.
MLA
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper. AIHW, 2015.
Vancouver
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper. Canberra: AIHW; 2015.
Harvard
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2015, The nKPI data collection: data quality issues working paper, AIHW, Canberra.
PDF | 851Kb
The AIHW collects data against a set of national Key Performance Indicators (nKPIs) from primary health care organisations that provide health care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. The nKPI data are collected every 6 months, reported back to organisations at the individual service level and compiled for national reporting purposes. The raw data received from health organisations are carefully checked to identify any data quality issues and are corrected, in consultation with services, through an ‘exception reporting’ process before the data are used in any type of reporting. This working paper identifies the most common data quality issues that lead to the issuing of exception reports, and suggests a number of options to improve the data collection process that will reduce the number of exception reports issued.
- ISBN: 978-1-74249-741-9
- Cat. no: IHW 153
- Pages: 36
-
Only one-third of ACCHS had data quality issues in their submissions compared with over three-quarters of non-ACCHS
-
Smaller services with 250 or less clients had more data quality issues than services with over 2,000 clients
-
Services using Communicare PIRS had less data quality issues compared to those with MMEX, BP and MD
-
Services submitting data manually had more data quality issues compared with those submitting data electronically