Quality of formal support

What is being tracked?

Measure: Proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64, and 65 and over) who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers

This measure is part of the Availability of support priority of the Strategy. This priority is about making sure people with disability have access to and receive the support services they need.

The desired outcome is that more people with disability are happy with the assistance they receive from support services.

Last updated: 30 Nov 2022

Outcome area: Personal and community support Priority: Availability of support

Baseline value

79%aged 15–64 in 2018

84%aged 65 and over in 2018
Latest value

79%aged 15–64 in 2018

84%aged 65 and over in 2018

Status not known yet more data from after the Strategy started are needed

View the data source

Trends

Has the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers changed over time?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers. Data from 2012 to 2018 are used. In 2018, 79% of people with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers in 2018, as were 81% in 2012.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Year	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
2012	81%	(78.6%–83.1%)
2015	80%	(77.6%–82.7%)
2018	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
2012	88%	(86.0%–89.5%)
2015	89%	(86.6%–91.1%)
2018	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
2012	85%	(83.3%–86.1%)
2015	85%	(83.2%–86.6%)
2018	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Has the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers changed over time?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers. Data from 2012 to 2018 are used. In 2018, 84% of people with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, compared with 88% in 2012.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Year	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
2012	81%	(78.6%–83.1%)
2015	80%	(77.6%–82.7%)
2018	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
2012	88%	(86.0%–89.5%)
2015	89%	(86.6%–91.1%)
2018	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
2012	85%	(83.3%–86.1%)
2015	85%	(83.2%–86.6%)
2018	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

State and territory

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary between states and territories?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by Australian states and territories. In 2018, 81% of people with disability in Victoria were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, and 74% of those in New South Wales (please note that some categories were not published due to small sample numbers and to protect confidentiality).

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

State/Territory	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
National	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
New South Wales	74%	(67.0%–81.8%)
Victoria	81%	(74.7%–87.0%)
Queensland	80%	(73.8%–87.0%)
Western Australia	*80%	(69.1%–90.3%)
South Australia	n.p.	n.p.
Tasmania	*68%	(50.4%–85.9%)
Australian Capital Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Aged 65 and over
National	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
New South Wales	83%	(78.8%–87.4%)
Victoria	84%	(79.1%–88.3%)
Queensland	84%	(79.1%–89.1%)
Western Australia	88%	(81.7%–93.9%)
South Australia	n.p.	n.p.
Tasmania	*77%	(65.3%–89.1%)
Australian Capital Territory	*56%	(27.3%–85.3%)
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Aged 15 and over
National	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)
New South Wales	80%	(76.3%–83.9%)
Victoria	82%	(78.5%–86.3%)
Queensland	82%	(78.4%–85.2%)
Western Australia	85%	(80.0%–89.7%)
South Australia	88%	(80.4%–96.2%)
Tasmania	77%	(69.0%–84.8%)
Australian Capital Territory	*77%	(60.6%–92.9%)
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.

* Should be used with caution: proportion has a Margin of Error (MoE) >10 percentage points or proportion ± MoE is <0% or >100%.
n.p. (not published) Category has been suppressed to avoid identifying individual people.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary between states and territories?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by Australian states and territories. In 2018, 88% of people with disability in Western Australia were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, and 83% of those in New South Wales (please note that some categories were not published due to small sample numbers and to protect confidentiality).

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

State/Territory	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
National	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
New South Wales	74%	(67.0%–81.8%)
Victoria	81%	(74.7%–87.0%)
Queensland	80%	(73.8%–87.0%)
Western Australia	*80%	(69.1%–90.3%)
South Australia	n.p.	n.p.
Tasmania	*68%	(50.4%–85.9%)
Australian Capital Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Aged 65 and over
National	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
New South Wales	83%	(78.8%–87.4%)
Victoria	84%	(79.1%–88.3%)
Queensland	84%	(79.1%–89.1%)
Western Australia	88%	(81.7%–93.9%)
South Australia	n.p.	n.p.
Tasmania	*77%	(65.3%–89.1%)
Australian Capital Territory	*56%	(27.3%–85.3%)
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.
Aged 15 and over
National	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)
New South Wales	80%	(76.3%–83.9%)
Victoria	82%	(78.5%–86.3%)
Queensland	82%	(78.4%–85.2%)
Western Australia	85%	(80.0%–89.7%)
South Australia	88%	(80.4%–96.2%)
Tasmania	77%	(69.0%–84.8%)
Australian Capital Territory	*77%	(60.6%–92.9%)
Northern Territory	n.p.	n.p.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Population groups

Indigenous status

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary for First Nations people and non-Indigenous Australians?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by Indigenous status. In 2018, 69% of First Nations people with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, as were 79% of non-Indigenous people (please note that the proportion for First Nations people has a high margin of error and should be used with caution).

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Indigenous status	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
First Nations	*69%	(52.3%–85.0%)
Non-Indigenous	79%	(75.9%–82.8%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
First Nations	n.p.	n.p.
Non-Indigenous	84%	(81.6%–86.2%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
First Nations	74%	(64.1%–83.8%)
Non-Indigenous	82%	(80.6%–84.1%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary for First Nations people and non-Indigenous Australians?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by Indigenous status. In 2018, 84% of non-Indigenous people with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers. Data for First Nations people could not be published due to low sample numbers.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Indigenous status	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
First Nations	*69%	(52.3%–85.0%)
Non-Indigenous	79%	(75.9%–82.8%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
First Nations	n.p.	n.p.
Non-Indigenous	84%	(81.6%–86.2%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
First Nations	74%	(64.1%–83.8%)
Non-Indigenous	82%	(80.6%–84.1%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Sex and gender

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by sex?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, for males and females. In 2018, 77% of males with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, as were 81% of females.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Sex	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Males	77%	(71.8%–82.1%)
Females	81%	(77.3%–84.0%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Males	85%	(81.4%–87.7%)
Females	84%	(81.2%–86.5%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Males	81%	(78.8%–83.8%)
Females	83%	(80.3%–84.8%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by sex?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, for males and females. In 2018, 85% of males with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, as were 84% of females.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Sex	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Males	77%	(71.8%–82.1%)
Females	81%	(77.3%–84.0%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Males	85%	(81.4%–87.7%)
Females	84%	(81.2%–86.5%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Males	81%	(78.8%–83.8%)
Females	83%	(80.3%–84.8%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Age group

Does the proportion of people with disability satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by age?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people aged 15 and over with disability who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by age. In 2018, 84% of people with disability aged 65 and over were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, as were 78% of those aged 25–44.

Age group	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
15–24	*70%	(58.3%–81.3%)
25–44	78%	(71.8%–83.8%)
45–64	81%	(77.7%–84.5%)
65 and over	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
All ages	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

* Should be used with caution: proportion has a Margin of Error (MoE) >10 percentage points or proportion ± MoE is <0% or >100%.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Cultural and linguistic diversity status

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by cultural and linguistic diversity background?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) status. In 2018, 74% of people from CALD backgrounds with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, and 80% among the non-CALD group (please note that the proportion for people from CALD backgrounds has a high margin of error and should be used with caution).

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Cultural and linguistic diversity status	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
CALD	*74%	(63.3%–83.8%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	*73%	(61.5%–83.6%)
Non-CALD	80%	(76.4%–83.1%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
CALD	77%	(70.8%–84.0%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	76%	(68.2%–84.5%)
Non-CALD	85%	(83.1%–87.6%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
CALD	76%	(70.9%–81.5%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	75%	(68.9%–81.2%)
Non-CALD	83%	(81.1%–84.9%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by cultural and linguistic diversity background?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) status. In 2018, 77% of people from CALD backgrounds with disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, compared with 85% among the non-CALD group.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Cultural and linguistic diversity status	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
CALD	*74%	(63.3%–83.8%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	*73%	(61.5%–83.6%)
Non-CALD	80%	(76.4%–83.1%)
All persons	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
CALD	77%	(70.8%–84.0%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	76%	(68.2%–84.5%)
Non-CALD	85%	(83.1%–87.6%)
All persons	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
CALD	76%	(70.9%–81.5%)
CALD – low English proficiency	n.p.	n.p.
CALD – high English proficiency	75%	(68.9%–81.2%)
Non-CALD	83%	(81.1%–84.9%)
All persons	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Remoteness

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by remoteness?

This bar chart shows the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by remoteness. In 2018, 81% of people with disability in major cities and 76% in inner regional areas were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Remoteness	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Major cities	81%	(77.6%–84.5%)
Inner regional	76%	(69.4%–81.7%)
Outer regional and remote	*73%	(62.1%–84.6%)
All areas	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Major cities	84%	(81.8%–86.7%)
Inner regional	86%	(81.9%–89.3%)
Outer regional and remote	79%	(70.3%–86.8%)
All areas	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Major cities	83%	(81.0%–84.9%)
Inner regional	82%	(78.7%–84.8%)
Outer regional and remote	76%	(70.6%–82.4%)
All areas	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

* Should be used with caution: proportion has a Margin of Error (MoE) >10 percentage points or proportion ± MoE is <0% or >100%.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by remoteness?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by remoteness. In 2018, 86% of people with disability in inner regional areas and 79% in outer regional and remote areas were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Remoteness	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Major cities	81%	(77.6%–84.5%)
Inner regional	76%	(69.4%–81.7%)
Outer regional and remote	*73%	(62.1%–84.6%)
All areas	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Major cities	84%	(81.8%–86.7%)
Inner regional	86%	(81.9%–89.3%)
Outer regional and remote	79%	(70.3%–86.8%)
All areas	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Major cities	83%	(81.0%–84.9%)
Inner regional	82%	(78.7%–84.8%)
Outer regional and remote	76%	(70.6%–82.4%)
All areas	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

* Should be used with caution: proportion has a Margin of Error (MoE) >10 percentage points or proportion ± MoE is <0% or >100%.

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Disability group

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by disability group?

This bar chart shows the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by disability group. In 2018, 78% of people with physical restriction and 73% of those with psychosocial disability were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Disability group	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Sensory and speech	74%	(66.0%–81.3%)
Intellectual	74%	(66.8%–81.3%)
Physical restriction	78%	(74.8%–81.8%)
Psychosocial	73%	(67.0%–78.2%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	74%	(63.8%–83.4%)
Other	78%	(72.5%–82.7%)
All with disability	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Sensory and speech	83%	(79.3%–86.6%)
Intellectual	76%	(67.0%–85.4%)
Physical restriction	83%	(81.1%–85.9%)
Psychosocial	74%	(68.2%–80.0%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	82%	(75.3%–89.1%)
Other	79%	(76.4%–82.4%)
All with disability	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Sensory and speech	81%	(77.7%–84.3%)
Intellectual	75%	(69.2%–80.7%)
Physical restriction	82%	(79.7%–83.4%)
Psychosocial	73%	(69.0%–77.1%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	78%	(72.4%–83.7%)
Other	79%	(76.1%–81.1%)
All with disability	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by disability group?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, by disability group. In 2018, 83% of both people with sensory and speech disability and of those with physical restriction were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, compared with 74% of people with psychosocial disability.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Disability group	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Sensory and speech	74%	(66.0%–81.3%)
Intellectual	74%	(66.8%–81.3%)
Physical restriction	78%	(74.8%–81.8%)
Psychosocial	73%	(67.0%–78.2%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	74%	(63.8%–83.4%)
Other	78%	(72.5%–82.7%)
All with disability	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Sensory and speech	83%	(79.3%–86.6%)
Intellectual	76%	(67.0%–85.4%)
Physical restriction	83%	(81.1%–85.9%)
Psychosocial	74%	(68.2%–80.0%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	82%	(75.3%–89.1%)
Other	79%	(76.4%–82.4%)
All with disability	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Sensory and speech	81%	(77.7%–84.3%)
Intellectual	75%	(69.2%–80.7%)
Physical restriction	82%	(79.7%–83.4%)
Psychosocial	73%	(69.0%–77.1%)
Head injury, stroke or acquired brain injury	78%	(72.4%–83.7%)
Other	79%	(76.1%–81.1%)
All with disability	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Severity of disability

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by severity of disability?

This bar chart shows the proportion of people with disability aged 15–64 who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by disability severity. In 2018, the proportion of people with disability who were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers was 76% for people with severe or profound disability and 81% for people with other disability status.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Severity of disability	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Severe or profound disability	76%	(70.2%–82.0%)
Other disability status	81%	(77.6%–84.3%)
All with disability	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Severe or profound disability	81%	(77.2%–84.3%)
Other disability status	87%	(83.8%–89.5%)
All with disability	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Severe or profound disability	79%	(75.9%–82.1%)
Other disability status	84%	(82.2%–86.2%)
All with disability	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by severity of disability?

The data in the graph and the table below show the proportion of people with disability aged 65 and over who are satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers, grouped by disability severity. In 2018, the proportion of people with disability who were satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers was 81% for people with severe or profound disability and 87% for people with other disability status.

More detailed data by age group are shown in the table.

Severity of disability	% of people with disability satisfied with quality of formal assistance	95% Confidence Interval
Aged 15–64
Severe or profound disability	76%	(70.2%–82.0%)
Other disability status	81%	(77.6%–84.3%)
All with disability	79%	(76.1%–82.2%)
Aged 65 and over
Severe or profound disability	81%	(77.2%–84.3%)
Other disability status	87%	(83.8%–89.5%)
All with disability	84%	(81.9%–86.3%)
Aged 15 and over
Severe or profound disability	79%	(75.9%–82.1%)
Other disability status	84%	(82.2%–86.2%)
All with disability	82%	(80.3%–83.8%)

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics – Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (SDAC) | Data source overview

Where did these data come from?

Data on quality of formal support come from survey data collected by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Learn more about these data

Next page Needs fully met

Quality of formal support

What is being tracked?

Baseline value

Latest value

Trends

Has the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers changed over time?

Has the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers changed over time?

State and territory

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary between states and territories?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary between states and territories?

Population groups

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary for First Nations people and non-Indigenous Australians?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary for First Nations people and non-Indigenous Australians?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by sex?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by sex?

Does the proportion of people with disability satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by age?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by cultural and linguistic diversity background?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by cultural and linguistic diversity background?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by remoteness?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by remoteness?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by disability group?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by disability group?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 15–64) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by severity of disability?

Does the proportion of people with disability (aged 65 and over) satisfied with the quality of assistance received from formal service providers vary by severity of disability?

Where did these data come from?

Connect with us

Feedback